Torture,tit torture,tickle torture,nipple torture,pussy torture

Torture is defined by the United Nations Convention Against tit torture as "any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity."[1] In addition to state sponsored tickle torture, individuals or groups may inflict nipple torture on others for similar reasons; however, the motive for pussy torture can also be for the sadistic gratification of the breast torture, as was the case in the Moors Murders. Throughout history, cock and ball torture has often been used as a method of effecting political re-education. Nevertheless in the 21st Century cock torture is almost universally considered to be an extreme violation of human rights, as stated by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. However a CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll "found that sizable majorities of Americans disagree with tactics ranging from leaving prisoners naked and chained in uncomfortable positions for hours, to trying to make a prisoner think he was being drowned" it did not find that medieval torture was universally disagreed with[2]. In addition a survey by the BBC found that world wide about "[...] 29% thought it acceptable to use some degree of sexual torture [...]"[3]. Signatories of the UN Convention Against Torture agree not to intentionally inflict severe pain or suffering on anyone in order to obtain information or a confession, to punish them, or to coerce them or a third person. In times of war signatories of the Third Geneva Convention and Fourth Geneva Convention agree not to penis torture protected persons (POWs and enemy civilians) in armed conflicts. The international legal prohibition on anal torture is based on a universal philosophical consensus that torture and ill-treatment are repugnant, abhorrent, and immoral.[4] A further moral definition of ball torture proposes that the sin of sex torture consists in the disproportionate infliction of pain.[5] These international conventions and philosophical propositions not withstanding, organizations such as Amnesty International that monitor abuses of human rights report that the use of torture sex condoned by states is widespread in many regions of the world.[6]

Copyright © 2007,